Due to the excellent quality of a shoe store lawyer the nd special civil court of goiânia denied a consumer's claim and ordered him to pay fees of r$ to the professional in addition to a fine of r$. For bad faith litigation. In the action the consumer stated that when making a purchase in the store using credit his registration was denied by the company which verified that his name was registered with credit protection agencies. As a result he went to court to remove the restriction on his behalf and receive compensation for moral damage.
To do this he claimed to be unaware of the debt Germany Phone Number and to have suffered a blow to his honor as he was subjected to ridicule in a crowded store. In response the store's lawyer nycolle soares partner at lara martins advogados stated that the purchase that led to the denial was made in october . Therefore there is no need to talk about ignorance of the debt. Furthermore the lawyer explained in the defense that the consumer had three other debts included in establishments with different dates and amounts. it can be seen that default is a common practice for the author and proposing compensation action based on undue denial is a way of unduly profiting from their actions said nycolle.
She also pointed out that the judiciary could not validate the client's bad faith conduct. When judging the case the judge of the nd special civil court of goiânia aldo guilherme saad sabino de freitas highlighted that there was no moral damage in the store's conduct. According to him the consumer lied in the initial petition which constitutes litigation in bad faith. The law in this case is the Consumer Protection Code article of the ADCT. The Consumer Protection Code in turn giving effectiveness to the constitutional precept and aiming to protect the consumer stipulates that protective standards are considered to be of public order and social interest article of the CDC.
发表于 2024-3-12 04:47:59
