Although the evidence provided by the statements

anik4200

Employees of the CCR group proved to be sufficient for the granting of the precautionary measure (fumus boni juris), I believe that for a condemnatory edict, based on the judgment of certainty, they are insufficient", he said. Nogueira stated that the action was proposed based on testimony from CCR employees who are also being investigated for acts of improbity: "This means that the evidence obtained in a purely inquisitorial procedure, and, therefore, without contradictory and broad defense , were not ratified in court through any other legitimate evidence, determined and conducted by a magistrate." Thus, according to the rapporteur, as these are not people who are in an equidistant position, on the contrary, they are directly interested in the procedural outcome, it was the Public Ministry's burden to prove the facts alleged by other evidence, "which did not happen in the present case" .


The fact is that, although the appellee was mentioned in testimonies during the civil investigation, there are, as far as I understand appropriate, no other evidentiary elements that provide any materiality to the suggested act of improbity. I therefore consider the judgment of unfoundedness to be correct, which, by this vote, it remains maintained", concluded Nogueira. The former deputy is represented by lawyer  Filipe da Silva Vieira . Proces Special Phone Number Data sarcelo Bretas, who led the decisions of the late "lava jet" in Rio de Janeiro and is removed from office by decision of the CNJ , was allegedly the target of blackmail by lawyer Nythalmar Dias Ferreira Filho. In 2020, Ferreira Filho reportedly wrote a letter addressed to the magistrate in which he demanded certain commitments made by the two, spoke of favors and threatened to reveal information that could harm Bretas.



The letter and information were published by Veja magazine . Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil Judge Marcelo Bretas was removed from office by decision of the CNJ Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil The document is currently in possession of the Federal Police and the Public Ministry, and was used to support the CNJ's decision to remove the judge. The letter says that Bretas guided the investigations according to his interests, aiming at specific targets, in addition to trying to involve ministers from the Federal Supreme Court. At the time of "Lava Jato", Ferreira Filho was a relatively unknown lawyer and attracted attention for the high-profile cases he took on. According to the magazine, he claimed to be close to Bretas. The lawyer, however, also began to be formally investigated, and from then on he allegedly began to blackmail him. In one of the excerpts of the letter cited by the magazine, Ferreira Filho refers to the episode in which Bretas was punished by the courts for participating in an event together with then-president Jair Bolsonaro.